National chicken council requires balance between pet care, ecological, economic impact in

February 12, 2018 | By alex | Filed in: National Chicken Council News.

"The Nation’s Chicken Council and it is people remain dedicated to chicken welfare, continuous improvement and respecting consumer choice – such as the growing marketplace for a slower growing bird," stated Ashley Peterson, Ph.D., NCC senior v . p . of scientific and regulatory matters. "However, these enhancements should be determined by science and knowledge – not activists’ emotional rhetoric – and that’s why we support further research around the subject of chicken welfare and growth rates."

Ecological Implications

In assessing a transition to some slower growing breed, the ecological impact is a vital component frequently excluded from the equation. If perhaps one-third of broiler chicken producers switched to some slower growing breed, nearly 1.5 billion more wild birds could be needed yearly to create the equivalent meat presently created – requiring a significant rise in water, land and fuel consumption:

  • Additional feed needed: Enough to fill 670,000 additional tractor trailers on the highway each year, using millions more gallons of fuel yearly.
  • Additional land needed: The extra land required to grow the feed (corn and soybeans) could be 7.six million acres/year, or roughly how big the whole condition of Maryland.
  • Additional manure output: Slower growing chickens may also remain on the farm longer, producing 28.5 billion additional pounds of manure yearly. That’s enough litter to produce a put on a football field that’s 27 occasions greater than the usual typical National football league stadium.
  • Additional water needed: 5.1 billion additional gallons water each year for that chickens to consume (excluding additional irrigation water that might be needed to develop the extra feed).

Economic Implications

When the industry didn’t make the additional 1.5 billion wild birds to satisfy current demand, the availability of chicken would considerably reduce to 27.5 billion less chicken meals each year.

The extra price of even 1/three of the industry switching to slower growing wild birds could be $9 billion, which will have a notable financial effect on foodservice companies, retailers, restaurants and eventually – consumers. This can place a considerable percentage of people in danger while increasing food instability for individuals who are able to least manage to have alterations in food prices.

A decrease in the U.S. chicken supply would also create a decreased supply to export worldwide where U.S. chicken is a vital protein for families in Mexico, Cuba, Africa and 100 other nations.

NCC’s Dedication to Chicken Welfare and Consumer Choice

"Slower growing," as based on the worldwide Animal Partnership, is equivalent to or under 50 grams of weight acquired per chicken each day averaged within the growth cycle, when compared with current industry average for those wild birds of roughly 61 grams each day. Which means that to be able to achieve exactly the same market weight, the wild birds will have to remain on the farm considerably longer.

For many years, the chicken industry has changed its products to satisfy ever-altering consumer preferences. Adapting and offering consumers more selections of what they need to consume continues to be the primary catalyst of success for chicken producers.

"We are the initial ones to understand that success shouldn’t come at the fee for the health and wellness from the wild birds," stated Peterson. "Without healthy chickens, our people wouldn’t be running a business.Inch

All current measurable data – livability, disease, condemnation, digestive and leg health – reflect the national broiler flock is really as healthy as ever.

"We do not determine if raising chickens slower compared to what they are today would advance our progress on health insurance and welfare – and that’s why NCC has expressed its support towards the U.S. Chicken and Egg Association for research funding in this region,Inch stated Peterson. "What we should can say for certain can there be are tradeoffs which you should consider chicken welfare, sustainability, and supplying safe, affordable food for consumers. There might not be any measurable welfare advantages to the wild birds, despite these negative effects. Research will let us identify should there be additional, unforeseen effects of raising wild birds for extended.Inch

NCC in 2017 may also be updating its Broiler Welfare Guidelines, last updated in 2014, and getting the rules certified by a completely independent 3rd party. The rules is going to be updated with the help of an instructional advisory panel composed of chicken welfare experts and veterinarians from across the U . s . States.

"NCC will still be in the industry of supplying and respecting consumer choice available on the market,Inch Peterson concluded. "Whether it’s typically elevated chicken, slower growing breeds, elevated without antibiotics or organic, consumers be capable of choose items that consider many factors, including taste preference, personal values and affordability."

To acquire more information and sources about how exactly chickens are elevated, visit

Study Methodology

The research was conducted August-September, 2016 by Elanco Animal Health, in consultation with Express Markets, Corporation., utilizing a simulation model that estimates the outcome of slow-growing broilers on feed, land, water utilization, waste/manure generated, and production cost. The model used average values of conventional versus. slow-grow broiler for mortality, grow-out days, feed conversion, days downtime, and site density. A complete copy from the study can be obtained here.

To see the initial version on PR Newswire, visit:

SOURCE National Chicken Council

Related Links


Tags: ,

Comments are closed here.